Three newly proposed anti-vaping laws need action by vapers and vaping businesses in Kansas, Maryland and North Dakota. It is much easier to stop a bill early in the process—by showing strong opposition while it is still being studied and heard in a committee—than waiting until it is voted on by the whole body of a legislature, when opinions are usually already formed.
Most readers in North Dakota will not see this article until after the Jan. 19 morning committee hearing. However, messages to the state senate opposing restrictions on vaping can never hurt, even if the bill has been approved by the committee or does not pass.
The Kansas House is considering HB 2061, which would ban sales of flavored (other than tobacco) vaping products.
The bill is not scheduled for a hearing yet, but CASAA is urging vapers to make their opposition known now, before the bill gains traction during a shortened legislative session. As in many states, the Kansas legislature may move bills quickly because of the coronavirus-shortened session.
The State Senate is considering SB 273, which would ban flavored vaping products (aside from tobacco) and online sales. The bill imposes other restrictions as well, which can be seen in the CASAA call to action linked below.
The senate finance committee is holding a hearing Jan. 28 at 1:00 p.m., at which testimony will be heard by invitation only. It’s important for vaping advocates to contact their state senators now.
The State Senate’s Finance and Taxation Committee is considering SB 2189, which would impose a 28 percent tax on vaping products sold in the state.
A committee hearing on the senate bill will be held Tuesday, Jan. 19 at 9:30 a.m. You can send comments up to an hour before the hearing—but even emails received after the hearing may be helpful. Follow the link below to make your comment.
With state legislative sessions now opening, vapers should expect to see many new bills introduced that will, if passed, restrict access to vaping products or make them more expensive. This year, with Tobacco 21 a done deal, advocates expect the primary focus of anti-vaping activists to be flavor bans and taxes. Outright vape bans that prohibit sales are not necessary to destroy vaping; we can lose it one step at a time.
Because of the coronavirus pandemic, many state legislatures are shortening their sessions, taking testimony remotely (usually via Zoom), and limiting the number of people allowed to testify. Because of these weird circumstances, bills may be more likely to appear suddenly and move through the process quickly. That makes it doubly important that vaping advocates build networks in their states to disseminate legislative news quickly.
The key to avoiding harmful anti-vaping laws is early and repeated engagement by people in the affected states or localities—the constituents of the legislators who will decide if bills pass. The best outcome is to stop bills before they’re approved by a committee, and that requires vapers and vaping businesses to be involved, respond to legislators, and spread the word to others who will respond. There is no substitute for engagement by large numbers of vaping stakeholders.
The Consumer Advocates for Smoke-Free Alternatives Association (CASAA) tracks state legislation and issues calls to action that make it easy for consumers to respond. (Disclosure: the author is a board member of CASAA.) This year Vaping360 will try to amplify as many CASAA calls to action as possible as they are issued. It’s even more important, however, that readers spread the word: alert friends in affected states or cities, post calls to action on social media, and contact CASAA directly if you hear of a local law that has been proposed.
