Have you noticed more people using e-cigarettes and other smoking alternatives lately? These gadgets, known as heated tobacco products (HTPs) and nicotine vaping products (NVPs), are becoming popular. But what are they, and how do they compare to regular cigarettes? Let’s dive in!
What Are HTPs and NVPs?
Heated tobacco products, like IQOS, heat tobacco without burning it. This creates a vapor instead of smoke. Nicotine vaping products, on the other hand, use liquid nicotine. This liquid gets turned into a vapor, which the user inhales. Unlike traditional cigarettes, there’s no smoke involved.
Craving for a Puff? How They Help
Many smokers are turning to HTPs and NVPs to help manage their nicotine cravings. Studies suggest that they might be helpful for this, but it’s still early days in research.
Breathing and Heart Health: Are They Safer?
This is a big question. Some studies say that HTPs and NVPs might be less harmful than regular cigarettes, but they’re not risk-free. It’s like choosing between two unhealthy snacks – one might be less bad, but it’s still not great for you.
What Do Users Say?
People who use these products often talk about the different ‘throat hit’ they get, and many find them easier to use than cigarettes. Some say they like the flavor better, too.
Health Risks: The Full Picture
We’re still learning about the long-term health effects of HTPs and NVPs. They’re not as bad as regular cigarettes, but health experts advise caution. It’s better to not smoke at all, but if you’re trying to quit, these might be a stepping stone.
What Do The Rules Say?
Laws about HTPs and NVPs vary around the world. In some places, they’re treated like cigarettes, while in others, the rules are more relaxed. It’s a hot topic for governments trying to balance public health with new technologies.
Looking Ahead: More Research Needed
There’s still a lot we don’t know about HTPs and NVPs. Scientists are working hard to understand more, which will help governments make better rules and give us all clearer advice.
Conclusion
HTPs and NVPs are interesting alternatives to smoking, but they’re not without risks. If you’re thinking about trying them, it’s a good idea to learn as much as you can and remember that not smoking at all is always the healthiest choice.
Referrence:
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. “FDA Authorizes Marketing of IQOS Tobacco Heating System with ‘Reduced Exposure’ Information.” 2020. FDA.gov
- Polosa, R. et al. “Health outcomes in COPD smokers using heated tobacco products: A 3-year follow-up.” Intern. Emerg. Med. 16(3), 687–696, 2021. PubMed
- Polosa, R. et al. “Impact of exclusive e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products use on muco-ciliary clearance.” Ther. Adv. Chronic Dis. 12, 20406223211035268, 2021. PubMed Central
- Benowitz, N. L. “The central role of pH in the clinical pharmacology of nicotine: Implications for abuse liability, cigarette harm reduction and FDA regulation.” Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 111, 1004–1006, 2022. PubMed
- Gravely, S. et al. “Do current smokers and ex-smokers who use nicotine vaping products daily versus weekly differ on their reasons for vaping? Findings from the 2020 ITC four country smoking and vaping survey.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19(21), 14130, 2022. PubMed Central
- Yong, H. H. et al. “Reasons for regular vaping and for its discontinuation among smokers and recent ex-smokers: Findings from the 2016 ITC four country smoking and vaping survey.” Addiction 114(Suppl. 1), 35–48, 2019. PubMed Central
- Dawkins, L. et al. “‘Vaping’ profiles and preferences: An online survey of electronic cigarette users.” Addiction 108, 1115–1125, 2013. PubMed
- DiPiazza, J. et al. “Sensory experiences and cues among E-cigarette users.” Harm Reduct. J. 17, 75, 2020. PubMed Central
- Hajek, P. et al. “Nicotine delivery and users’ reactions to Juul compared with cigarettes and other e-cigarette products.” Addiction 115, 1141–1148, 2020. PubMed Central
- Poynton, S. et al. “A novel hybrid tobacco product that delivers a tobacco flavour note with vapour aerosol (Part 1): Product operation and preliminary aerosol chemistry assessment.” Food Chem. Toxicol. 106, 522–532, 2017. PubMed
