VAPEFLY TGO POD MOD review – A fingerprint unlocking pod – DirtyCheck No.71

Most pod mods on the market are similar.
In a market that is increasingly pursuing difference and seeking innovation,
What kinds of devices are unique?
Today, Captain will bring you the review of VAPEFLY’s TGO PDO MOD.

VAPEFLY brand introduction

Many friends may don’t know this brand,
In fact, this brand has also produced many impressive devices,
For example, the Jester POD that was pretty good.


In China, VAPEFLY has an excellent R&D team,
Composed of experienced engineers who have worked for the top brands in the vape industry for more than 5 years.
Outstanding marketing and sales team,
Their strategy is to make the best vape gadgets by getting close to the local vapers in each country,
So that each product is unique and can meet the needs of local vapers.
In Germany, there is the German 103 group,
Composed of Vapefly and Martin, they are called Damfwolke7,
This is one of the most famous YouTubers in Germany,
The members are all passionate German vaper.
They continue to contribute their creativity and preferences in the development of new products designed specifically for the German market.
Their factory was established in 2014,
Providing more than 5 years of OEM/ODM experience for most top brands in the e-cigarette industry.
The Vapefly brand was launched in 2017,
Its refillable atomizer is the earliest product in all three product lines it currently offers.
Taking customer demand as the growth engine,
VAPEFLY is always committed to providing the most suitable products for different markets around the world.


VAPEFLY TGO POD MOD introduction


VAPEFLY TGO POD MOD parameters/ specifications

Power: 5w-70w
Power: 2300mAh
Body size: 50mm*23mm*102mm
Support type-c interface charging



Yellow black, pure black, silver black, gray black, black red, red black, Tiffany blue black



Advanced dual mode settings,
Fingerprint mode and regular mode,
Yes, fingerprint mode, you heard that right.
TGO POD MOD has two administrator fingerprint settings and 4 ordinary user fingerprint settings.
After starting the machein, tap the button to enter the fingerprint mode and enter the fingerprint,
Just like using the iphone to enter the fingerprint.


Then quickly tap the power button 3 times to switch between fingerprint mode and normal mode.
Normal mode can be used at any time,
In fingerprint mode, it can only be used when the fingerprint enter to the power button to turn on.
In other words, this device supports user identification.
Other users can’t use it, or it will appear “Please Touch” when using,
But after the actual experience, except the high-tech feeling,
I didn’t get more surprises.


TGO atomizing core

TGO POD MOD can automatically identify the original two atomizing cores,
TGO0.3ohm and TGO0.6ohm,
The best power specified by the official side and the recommended suitable nicotine range are respectively:
30w-40w power, nicotine content is less than or equal to 10mg;
20w-28w power, nicotine content is less than or equal to 20mg.
From the objective data,
This POD MOD is not suitable for nicotine salt e-liquid,
But the friendly thing is that TGO launched the RBA kit.
This must be purchased additionally.
Theoretically, salt vape juice can be smoked on it. Those who like to smoke salt don’t have to worry about it.


Atomizing tank

The structure of the atomization chamber and the mouthpiece shows that
The overall trend of this device is still oriented to the taste type.
No big drip nozzle used,
But the drip nozzle has no replaceable settings,
This is a pity,
It can’t follow the vaper’s personal collocation of drip nozzles


Press the triangle button to push to add vape juice,
It’s a pity that the tank body is not transparent enough.
It’s hard to fill up without enough effort.
The visualization of the tank body needs to be further upgraded.
In this way, you can keep track of the juice usage.


VAPEFLY TGO POD MOD user experience

The TGO atomization core gives me the feeling that it has a strong & good taste.
Whether it’s the vaporization of 0.2ohm or 0.6ohm,
The vaping details are not completed shown.
Captain uses JAGO Juice and KC Juice,
In the end, it was found that the overall vaping was full, sweet, and smokey.
However, the details and outstanding features of this type of vape juice are not well experienced.
Not so suitable for desserts flavors,
Later I used the grape Juice from BRUCE,
Feeling it a bit right.
I feel it very straightforward,
Finally, I personally think that Juice with fruit flavor or single flavor is more suitable for VAPEFLY TGO POD MOD.



Supported by high technology,
VAPEFLY TGO POD MOD has made the limelight in this type of device.
The concept of one person, one machine is not outdated in this era.
The overall design style and materials are considered to be very textured and beautiful.

However, there is a need for greater improvement in accessory support.
The taste of a device is crucial,
Captain Dirty also looks forward to an effective and scientific adjustment to TGO in the later period,
Making the use of this device the most ideal.
Alright, I’m Captain Dirty, see you next time.

Buy VAPEFLY TGO POD MOD on VAPEFLY official site


FDA May Hate Their Guts, But the PMTA Process Favors JUUL

Juul Labs has filed its long-awaited PMTA, which includes no flavored products aside from tobacco and menthol pods. Juul filed six weeks before the Sept. 9 Premarket Tobacco Application deadline for all vaping products.

Assuming the company’s application is accepted for substantive review, Juul will be able to leave its current products on the market for a year, or until the FDA makes a final decision. The only tobacco products to receive PMTA approval so far have been snus from Swedish Match, and Philip Morris International’s heated tobacco product IQOS. FDA review of those products took more than two years.

Juul Labs (note the new capitalization convention: the company is Juul Labs, the product is still JUUL) announced the filing yesterday, referring to the products submitted as the “JUUL System.” Juul noted that only Virginia Tobacco and Menthol flavored pods (in both 5 and 3 percent nicotine strengths) were part of the application, but didn’t describe which devices made up the “system.” It is widely known that the company has new versions of its well-known pod vape with features that aren’t part of the currently sold device, including an age verification system for users.

In January, HHS Secretary Alex Azar promised a “streamlined” PMTA process, but no changes to the onerous, expensive system have been made.

To leave the original product on the market while the application is considered by the FDA, the JUUL PMTA must include both the current device and any advanced products. That means doing duplicate testing and research for each device submitted—something only a wealthy vape company like Juul Labs could afford.

Few if any small, independent vaping businesses have the financial resources to submit an effective PMTA. Industry advocates are pressing the FDA and its parent agency the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to adopt a simplified version of the approval pathway for small manufacturers. And while hundreds of small companies are proceeding with plans to submit PMTAs based on a model version of the simplified process, the federal agencies have offered no sign that the small companies’ applications will be accepted for review. In January, HHS Secretary Alex Azar promised a “streamlined” PMTA process, but no changes to the onerous, expensive system have been made.

Approval of a PMTA requires a manufacturer to prove to the FDA that its product is “appropriate for the protection of public health”—a requirement defined in the 2009 Tobacco Control Act. That definition means that the product must benefit the health of the population as a whole, including not just the smokers likely to reduce their health risks by switching, but also non-smokers and kids who may desire to experiment with “tobacco products.”

The process was deliberately created to get rid of thousands of small vape manufacturers, which are seen by the FDA as an unregulatable “wild west.”

The JUUL application, for example, contains “detailed scientific data from over 110 studies totaling over 125,000 pages evaluating the product’s impact on both current users of tobacco products and nonusers, including those who are underage.” According to the company, its PMTA includes research showing:

  • “The harm reduction potential of the product”
  • “The controlled design and repeatable manufacturing processes associated with the JUUL System”
  • “Data-driven measures to limit unintended consequences to the overall population, including initiation among nonusers”

Proving its product won’t attract additional youth vapers is a high bar for Juul to reach, and producing such evidence cost Juul Labs millions of dollars, and required a team of scientists working full time on nothing but the JUUL PMTA. Even with its history of antagonizing the FDA (just last week a story claimed that Juul secretly changed its product after the Aug. 8, 2016 cutoff date that froze products in place), and its position as the favorite whipping boy of anti-vaping tobacco control groups, Juul will face fewer PMTA hurdles than small vape companies.

“Preparing and satisfying a PMTA is no easy task, with applications that are millions of pages long, costing millions in resources, and requiring significant scientific support,” financial analyst Ryan Tompkins told Convenience Store News. Most of the companies submitting PMTAs are paying for their applications with money made by selling cigarettes.

For the FDA, dealing with a handful of huge companies that already know how to play the compliance game was always the goal.

The FDA PMTA guidance for manufacturers is intentionally vague and loosely defined. Everything is left up to the manufacturer—and without a staff of experienced regulatory compliance experts, it is impossible to even make an educated guess about what will or won’t be needed to satisfy the agency. The only PMTA approval history they have to base their guesses on comes from products very different from vapes.

A company like E-Alternative Solutions, for example—which just submitted its own PMTA—probably had to rely on freelance compliance consultants to do its testing and analysis. And EAS likely depended on the Chinese manufacturing facilities it contracts with to provide details about components and manufacturing processes.

Juul, on the other hand, controls its own production from raw materials to packaging, which makes study and explanation of manufacturing processes simpler and more accurate than would be possible for companies that depend on a variety of suppliers and sub-manufacturers. That is also true of the products that have already received PMTA approval.

The vaping industry’s rapid consumer-driven, bottom-up innovation is incompatible with the Tobacco Control Act, and the FDA’s Deeming Rule was designed to drive that point home. The process was deliberately created to get rid of thousands of small vape manufacturers, which are seen by the FDA as an unregulatable “wild west.”

Even if the PMTA deadline gets pushed back till next year, the FDA can smell blood now.

The agency never intended to create a process that would allow small businesses to thrive and help customers migrate away from cigarettes. For the FDA, dealing with a handful of huge companies that already know how to play the compliance game was always the goal.

There may yet be additional delays of the deadline because of challenges created by the coronavirus pandemic. Even if the PMTA deadline gets pushed back till next year, the FDA can smell blood now. The agency is on the brink of getting what it has wanted since March 2009, when it seized e-cigarettes coming from China and tried to ban them as illegal drug devices.

Meanwhile, all of the tobacco companies that make vaping products—BAT/Reynolds (Vuse), Japan Tobacco (Logic), and Fontem/Imperial (blu)—have submitted their own applications, and probably have a good chance of approval. And if their PMTAs are rejected, they have the perfect backup plan: selling cigarettes.

Smokers created vaping without any help from the tobacco industry or anti-smoking crusaders, and vapers have the right to keep innovating to help themselves. My goal is to provide clear, honest information about the challenges vaping faces from lawmakers, regulators, and brokers of disinformation. I recently joined the CASAA board, but my opinions aren’t necessarily CASAA’s, and vice versa. You can find me on Twitter @whycherrywhy

Source link

The FDA Authorizes the Marketing of IQOS as a Modified Risk Tobacco Product

In December 2016, Philip Morris International (PMI) had submitted a Modified Risk Tobacco Product (MRTP) application with the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products, for its Heat Not Burn device: iQOS.

The initial FDA panel had not agreed that the device reduced the risk of smoking related diseases, however they did agree that using iQOS instead of regular cigarettes, would significantly reduce a person’s exposure to harmful chemicals.

The iQOS device, is a smokeless alternative to combustible cigarettes which works by heating tobacco leaves known as Heets or HeatSticks. These refills which look like short cigarettes, must be inserted into the device, and are heated up once the iQOS device is switched on.

When the iQOS application was first reviewed, an FDA panel had voted to reject over a million pages of evidence, dismissing PMI’s claim that iQOS is a safer alternative to tobacco. Additionally, Senators Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) had sent a letter addressed to then FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, urging him to deny the MRTP application for iQOS.

Meanwhile, in April 2019, the FDA authorized the IQOS PMTAs and in the following months, PM USA started launching the device across the US, starting with Atlanta, followed by Georgia, Richmond and Virginia.

IQOS to be marketed as a modified risk product

Subsequently earlier this month, Altria Group announced that the FDA has authorized the marketing of IQOS as a modified risk tobacco product with a reduced exposure claim. “We’re delighted that the FDA authorized IQOS to be marketed as a modified-risk tobacco product. This authorization gives PM USA an opportunity to communicate additional benefits of switching to IQOS and this decision is an important step for adult smokers. Our 10-year vision is to responsibly lead the transition of adult smokers to a non-combustible future. IQOS is a key part of that future as we develop our portfolio of FDA-authorized, non-combustible products and actively switch adult smokers to them,” said Billy Gifford, Chief Executive Officer of Altria.

Read Further: Bakersfield

BAT Sues PMI on Grounds That IQOS Technology Infringed its Patents

Source link

Myst Labs vape opens another 50 stores in China

Following the opening of 20 new stores in May, Myst Labs, the leading e-cigarette provider, continued to expand steadily in China. In June, a total of 50 Myst Labs new stores nationwide opened one after another, which is expected to provide more than 200 jobs in more than 33 cities.

It is understood that the 50 new stores opened this time cover Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Wuhan, Chengdu, Hangzhou, Shenyang, Harbin, Zhuhai, Chongqing, Kunming, Ningbo, Fuzhou, Foshan and other cities, and many stores have landed in first-tier shopping malls such as Vientiane City, Huihui, CapitaLand Plaza, Aegean Shopping Park, Intime Department Store, Jinyuan New Lufthansa Mall, etc. Among them, Wuhan, which has been greatly affected by the epidemic, Myst Labs opened 5 new stores there,which is the city with the most new stores.

In the face of the “reduction wave” brought about by the epidemic, ensuring employment has become the focus of industrial development in the post-epidemic era. Myst Labs hopes to continue to promote the development of the industry through innovation, and also strive to create more employment opportunities and help “stabilize employment.”

“This time we expect to be able to provide more than 200 new jobs in more than 33 cities, plus the 20 new stores opened in May, the total number of people is expected to be more than 300 people. We will pay for entry, material exhibition, member operation management and full-link marketing, and provide help and support to shopkeepers, as far as possible, to help more people find the direction of entrepreneurship in difficult times,” said the relevant person in charge of Myst Labs.

In the context of the epidemic speeding up the reshuffle of the e-cigarette industry, Myst Labs bucked the trend with an average of nearly 50 new stores every month, and it is inseparable from its deep cultivation and innovation in core technology and product capabilities.

In April this year, Myst Labs released its original new generation of nicotine technology, Nicotine X. Nicotine X technology can make the e-liquid maintain a proper buzz and a clearer throat hit even when the nicotine content is reduced to 1.7%. The birth of this disruptive technology provides smokers with high addiction relief with being addicted too much.

This technological breakthrough not only received a warm response in the industry, but also brought confidence to the majority of e-cigarette industry practitioners. In May of this year, Myst Labs bucked the trend and expanded, opening a total of 20 new stores across the country, and opening an overseas layout, entering more than 300 retail stores in the UK; Myst Labs has also been recognized by the official British medical institution, and its products have entered Birmingham City Hospital and Sandwell General Hospital.

Contact the Myst Labs official to learn more

Motto pod vape review – DirtyCheck No.70

Friends who are familiar with Motto have always been impressed by the quality of the e-liquid of Lucky 13, Lucky Bastard.
Motto, as an American e-liquid brand that has been welcomed by a large number of vapers worldwide,
Its cartridges had some problems before, after repeated revisions,
Let’s see what its experience will be.

Motto pod vape review

Flavor introduction

This time we will experience several good flavors of Motto,
Because flavored cartridges like citrus ice are not updated,
So we don’t experience it here.

Motto pod vape review

Burning coffee (5% nicotine salt)

The rich taste of coffee is authentic,
And the creamy taste is relatively neutral.
The slight milk taste is interesting,
Kind of like latte
At present, I think the key point grasp of Motto e-liquid is very good
A small amount of bitterness gives me a long aftertaste.
However, it’s really greasy in summer.

Bourbon tobacco (5% nicotine salt)

This is one of my best tobacco flavors so far,
The light malt taste is very good,
The echo feeling of vaping is really endless.
Interesting taste,
The silky texture has a hint of dryness,
The first choice to replace cigarettes.

Motto pod vape review

Awakening Mint (4% nicotine salt )

Old customers of Motto must know this taste,
Whether it’s word of mouth and experience,
They are pretty good in the hearts of old customers,
An aggressive mint hits the brain directly,
Mint feels very good overall,
But did not go too far to rich mint.
The perfumer controls it very well.

Crispy watermelon (4% nicotine salt)

The watermelon taste control is pretty good,
The sweetness and fruity aroma are very well mixed.
The only downside is that the mint aftertaste is relatively overwhelming,
Diluting the aftertaste of the whole experience.
Hope they reduce the coolness,
To achieve the best taste experience

Motto pod vape review


Many friends complained about this pod vape before,
“Make e-liquid with heart, and make device with toes”,
In this cartridge adjustment, Motto did show their sincerity.
Avoided the previous problems of excessive condensation and e-liquid spitting into the mouth.
Overall, the experience has improved,
Motto did a good job with nicotine salt.
It gives up the ordinary 3% ratio, which is unique.
This time I give a thumb up to Motto.
Friends who were disappointed before shall come back and try again,
To see what is different.
Alright, I’m Captain Dirty, see you next time.

Where to buy Motto pod vape

Motto pod vape review Motto pod vape review Motto pod vape review

Study Shows Higher Vape Taxes Lead to Increased Smoking

Until recently, taxes on vaping products in the United States were rare. That all changed with the panic over JUUL and teen vaping. With every news story that hyped the “epidemic” of adolescent use came added pressure for legislators to do something. And one of their favorite things to do is raise taxes.

As we celebrated New Year’s Day 2019, just nine states and the District of Columbia had vapor product taxes. On Aug. 1, 2020, 25 states will have a tax—as well as D.C., Puerto Rico, two Alaskan boroughs, counties in Illinois and Maryland, and the city of Chicago. When Georgia’s tax goes into effect next year, more states will have a vape tax than not. Cigarettes, of course, have been taxed at widely differing rates for decades.

Is it possible that increasing taxes on vaping products will drive some people to smoking—and vice versa? The answer is yes, according to a new study from Georgia State University researcher Michael Pesko and two colleagues. The paper was published in the Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.

The authors show that increasing taxes on vaping products results in a corresponding and predictable increase in cigarette use. Likewise, increasing the cigarette tax boosts adoption of vaping products. Unlike previous studies, the authors don’t simply measure sales increases in one or both categories, but actual use of the products. And because they were able to access “geocoded” versions of the survey datasets they employed, they were able to accurately assess the effects of tax changes in closeup detail, studying specific geographic areas and cross-border economic activity.

The authors used data collected in two large U.S. government surveys—the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), and the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Smoking data were available for the period between 2011 and 2018. But because the surveys didn’t collect vaping data until 2014 (NHIS) and 2016 (BRFSS), those were the first years they were able to study.

The authors explain that cigarettes and vapor products seem to be economic substitutes. That means that a price increase in one product will cause sales growth in the other (an effect called cross-price elasticity). In some states, like New York, cigarette prices are so high that it might be almost impossible to tax vapes enough to send vapers back to smoking for price reasons alone. But in many states that isn’t the case, and changes in the tax rates do push consumers from one product to the other.

The researchers found that a $1 increase in the per-pack cigarette tax increased daily vaping by 14.2 percent. A $1 (per milliliter) increase in the vapor product tax increased daily smoking by 5.3 percent. The effect was especially noticeable in consumers under age 40, who are more likely to migrate from cigarettes to vapes than older adults.

“These results suggest that smokers use e-cigarettes when traditional cigarette taxes rise, either to continue to consume some portion of their regular nicotine at a lower relative price or as a means to quit smoking,” the authors write.

They also observed that a $1 increase in the vaping product tax reduces the probability of dual use (using both products during the same time period). Dual use is often portrayed by anti-vaping groups as being worse than smoking alone, but it can be an indicator that a smoker is trying to quit or substantially reduce their cigarette intake—both very good things.

“E-cigarette taxes may reduce dual use rates by discouraging adult smokers from trying to use e-cigarettes to quit,” the authors write, correctly identifying dual use as a positive step rather than a necessarily negative outcome.

Vaping advocates have always believed that vapers—especially new and uncommitted vapers—are highly sensitive to price fluctuations in vapes and cigarettes. Now there is real evidence to show legislators when they question whether e-liquid or device taxes will really send users back to cigarettes. They will. For public health reasons alone, substantially differential taxes—favoring vaping products—should be the policy goal of ethical lawmakers.

“These results suggest caution in regulating e-cigarettes because e-cigarette regulations may have a harmful, unintended consequence: increased smoking of traditional cigarettes,” write the researchers.

Dr. Pesko has been studying the economics of vaping and smoking for a few years, turning out a series of interesting studies. Many of them, including the current one, were first published by the non-partisan National Bureau of Economic Research. His co-authors, Charles J. Courtemanche (University of Kentucky) and Johanna Catherine Maclean (Temple University), have also published extensively at NBER.

Source link

Vapers May Be Inhaling More Toxicants When Using Lower Nicotine Concentrations

“If you reduce the strength you compensate – that’s costly financially, and comes with a health cost.”

It is widely known that when vaping lower nicotine concentrations, vapers tend to take longer and more frequent puffs. The study titled, “Daily Exposure to Formaldehyde and Acetaldehyde and Potential Health Risk Associated With Use of High and Low Nicotine E-Liquid Concentrations,” analysed these puffing behaviors in two different nicotine concentrations, measuring the different levels of carbonyl compounds exposure that these led to.

To this effect, data gathered from 19 experienced e-cigarette users who switched between 18 and 6 mg/ml e-liquids with and without power adjustments. “Switching from a higher to a lower nicotine concentration was associated with greater exposure regardless of whether power settings were fixed or adjustable which is likely due to increased liquid consumption under lower nicotine concentration settings. Daily exposure for formaldehyde and acetaldehyde was higher for 17/19 participants when using low (6 mg/mL) compared with high (18 mg/mL) nicotine e-liquid concentration when power was fixed,” read the study Abstract.

The EU TPD Nicotine Cap

Earlier research and arguments by public health experts had echoed these findings. Referring to the nicotine cap enforced by the EU TPD, in 2018 leading nicotine researcher Dr Lynne Dawkins from the Centre for Addictive Behaviours Research, said that data she had personally compiled, had indicated that vapers compensate for lower-nicotine concentration liquids by vaping more.

“There is no rationale for that cap – it seems arbitrary to me. There’s no evidence for increased harms of nicotine for levels above 20mg/ml. In light of research by our group, if you reduce the strength you compensate – that’s costly financially, and comes with a health cost,” said Dawkins at the time.

The risk in selling reduced-nicotine cigarettes

Source link

Vapers Wanted: Be Part of a Global Study Looking Into Vaping Safety

The lead scientist and global project manager for the VERITAS (Vaping effects: real-world international surveillance) Cohort Study, is Dr. Carl V. Phillips, and it is headed by award winning Dr. Polosa.

An episode of RegWatch live streamed on the 21st of July, hosts Dr. Phillips who explains why the VERITAS Study is by far the most substantial study of the health effects of vaping (in the absence of smoking) and will provide invaluable information for vapers, smokers, and policymakers.

“It is the single most important question: Is vaping safe? Despite a mountain of research pointing to low health risks associated with vaping compared to smoking; a definitive answer remains elusive. But researchers behind a new multi-site international study of the health effects of vaping hope to remedy that and need your help.”

Anyone wishing to be part of this invaluable study is encouraged to find out more by listening to the recorded episode, live on the 21st of July.

The Vaping Weekly Podcast: Chelsea Boyd of R Street Institute; IQOS MRTP; Australia Update

Source link

Native American Reservations a Haven for New York Vape Shops

Around Thanksgiving 2019, two months after Governor Andrew Cuomo signed an executive order that banned sales of flavored vaping products in New York, Taobi Silva thought he’d give the vape business another shot.

Rob Ermolovich, the owner of a shop called Fluid Vapor and a local e-liquid manufacturing business, had given Silva a call, asking if he’d be interested in some kind of partnership. Silva and Ermolovich knew what was coming, as did many in the industry. Consumers, shop owners and manufacturers had already started to see prohibition as an inevitability, and had begun to prepare accordingly.

They weren’t wrong. Though a State Supreme Court justice eventually blocked Cuomo’s executive order months later, the governor soon managed to get what he wanted. On April 3, just past 3:30 am, the New York State Assembly passed a budget that included a flavor ban. It remains in effect.

But while everybody else was panicking, Silva was not. He felt, rather, the opposite. He is a member of the Shinnecock Nation, the 1,500-person tribe outside of South Hampton, Long Island. And he saw a distinct opportunity.

Because they are members of the tribe and conduct business on their sovereign land, the New York State flavor ban does not apply.

In March, on the reservation where his family has run a smoke shop for generations, Silva and his uncle, Jonathan Smith, opened up a brand-new, sister vape shop—to which, because they are members of the tribe and conduct business on their sovereign land, the New York State flavor ban does not apply.

Ermolovich had spotted this opening and had a proposal: He would close his storefront in Bohemia, about 40 miles west of the reservation, and set up his operations at Silva’s. So since the middle of March, that’s exactly what he has been doing—making his signature e-liquid in the back of the shop and selling it to his recurring customer base, which Silva estimated to be in the hundreds. Even during the COVID-19 shutdowns, their walk-up and drive-thru business remained steady. It also remains completely legal.

“Several smoke shops here, like mine, had tried vaping years ago, and the market was flooded with brands and flavors and strengths,” Silva told Filter. “To get into it, however, you’re talking about a five-figure investment into these products. And, before Juul, you didn’t even know who the leader was. Things, obviously, are different now.”

Because only Shinnecock tribe members can own property on tribal land, Silva had to hire Ermolovich and his wife, Kim, as 1099 subcontractors. The couple brought with them not only their loyal patrons, but also their e-liquids, registered with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which Silva hopes one day to put into disposables or pod-based cartridges compatible with Juul*—the latter of which are almost all currently banned under federal policy.

Silva said that he was unaware of any other Native American reservation in New York State where flavored e-liquids are being manufactured, and believed that he and Ermolovich could very well be the sole example of this sort of partnership.

As it turns out, that might not be the case. Filter later spoke with another e-liquid manufacturer in the state, who requested anonymity out of fear of reprisal.

“The best way to describe it,” he said, treading carefully as he outlined a similar scenario, “is that a manufacturer in New York State helped a Native American set up a new business to sell [the manufacturer’s] flavored e-liquid on sovereign land.”

There are plenty of rumors, too. Several vape shop owners around Buffalo and Niagara Falls, for instance, insisted off-the-record that rivals had packed up and somehow moved onto neighboring Native land, probably by partnering up as Silva and Ermolovich did.

It was less a question of if this would happen, and more of when.

It wasn’t possible to independently verify these claims, but they seem plausible when the scenario was not necessarily unfamiliar or unpredictable. Last fall, when Washington State issued a flavor ban that would later be reversed, local tribes were reportedly torn on whether or not to follow suit.

It was less a question of if this would happen, said Andrew Osborne, the vice president of the New York Vapor Association, and more of whenas the entire vape economy in New York and other restricted states has begun to shift to gray and illicit markets following the pandemic and a variety of prohibitive measures. (For manufacturers, there is also the anticipation of having to file what many claim to be exhaustive and expensive premarket tobacco product applications, or PMTAs, with the FDA in September.)

Flavors, much of the industry asserts, constitute a bulk of sales, and without them, most vape shops would simply shutter. Vape shop owners and e-liquid manufacturers have been forced to stop altogether, or to defy their state governments and get creative with workarounds.

“The reservations are certainly part of that gray market and will keep being so,” Osborne told Filter. “In the immediate days after the flavor ban, people were either calling or coming to my store, and telling me that reservations still had flavors available.”

“If I didn’t have a business partner,” he continued, “I’d have more seriously considered moving to the reservation myself somehow.”

It’s not just the ability to produce and sell flavors that’s appealing. New York State’s 20 percent excise tax on vapor products and nearly 9 percent sales tax also do not apply to the Shinnecock and other tribes. Essentially, Silva said, patrons can spend almost 30 percent less than they normally spend, and nobody has to worry about breaking the law.

The Shinnecock Nation’s Office of Tribal Tobacco Products (OTTP) regulates the industry on the reservation, and so far, there has not been much concern about vaping.

“The OTTP will continue to monitor the totality of the e-cig debate and will advise and recommend any necessary regulations or public-health concerns with the Council of Trustees,” Bryan Polite, the tribe’s chairman, wrote in an email to Filter. “The Shinnecock Nation takes great pride in our self-governance on our ancestral territory, but also has always understood the enormous responsibility.”

Yet the issue with tobacco has always been a contentious one. Native Americans and Native Alaskans have “the highest prevalence of cigarette smoking among all racial/ethnic groups” in the United States, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Shinnecock and New York have often butt heads about it: They’ve long been engaged, especially, in back-and-forth litigation about the tribe’s right to sell untaxed cigarettes.

Flavored vapes, far safer than cigarettes, are nonetheless equally contentious in New York legislators’ eyes.

Most recently, however, the Shinneock Nation has made news after building a pair of massive billboards on their land, much to the chagrin of the wealthy Hamptonites who drive past them on the way to the beach. Over the last year, the Shinneock have been battling local and state governments in court for the right to construct them, and in May, the State Supreme Court sided with the tribe.

The members thought the billboards—which they refer to as “monuments”—could bolster their economy by attracting the Hamptons’ high-end clientele to purchase luxury brands on the reservation. They saw an opening, just as Silva did with flavored vaping products.

But like the builders of the billboard, Silva hasn’t had things all his own way.

“I’m going to speculate, but I think the black market is still so significant that we’re not seeing any spillover,” he said of his solid business so far. “You would figure that we’d be stampeded. That’s not been the case.”

“It’s not disappointing,” he continued, “but it’s not meeting my growth expectations.”

US: Georgia Vape Bill Imposing a Tax And Age Limit, Signed Into law

The illegality of substances pushes teens to obtain them from the black market where they are unregulated and possibly unsafe.

Earlier this month, the Georgia Senate voted in favour of the bill which is focused on vaping and its impact on young adults. It passed overwhelmingly in both the House and Senate, and the excise tax placed on vaping products is executed to generate approximately $4.3 billion each year. “We’re just trying to do it for the safety of the kids, that’s the bottom line,” said Walker County School Nurse John Logan.

In line with the new law, anyone under 21 caught with a vaping device, will have their e-cigarette confiscated and be punished with a fine or community service. When a device is confiscated, it will become the property of the state and be destroyed. “I have a cabinet just absolutely full of these devices that I’ve taken from these kids,” said Walker County Sheriff Deputy Bruce Coker. If the punishment is not fulfilled, students will have their driving licence suspended.

Do tobacco age limits work?

Meanwhile experts have different opinions about implementing such tobacco age limits. Discussing such legislations in 2017, Richard J. Thoune, a health officer for the Jackson County Health Department, had argued that since 95% of smokers begin smoking before the age of 21, such age limits make sense as the earlier a person starts to smoke, the harder it is for them to curb the habit.

On the other end of the stick, State Government Relations Manager from the The Heartland Institute Lindsey Stroud, had rightly pointed out that the illegality of other substances does not stop youngsters from consuming them. On the contrary, it just pushes them to obtain these substances illegally, at times from the black market where they are unregulated and possibly unsafe. “The National Institute on Drug Abuse reported in its Monitoring the Future Study: Trends in Prevalence of Various Drugs 58% of 12th graders reported consuming alcohol in 2015.”

Read Further: WCRBtv

Mississippi Will Increase Tobacco/Vaping Age Limit to 21

Source link