Press Release
March 2023
New GSTHR Briefing Paper addresses the tobacco harm reduction potential of nicotine pouches
The UK-based public health agency Knowledge-Action-Change (K.A.C) is today launching the latest in a series of Briefing Papers as part of its Global State of Tobacco Harm Reduction (GSTHR) project.
Credit GSTHR
What are nicotine pouches? provides an overview of the latest information about the scientific evidence, market data, regulatory landscape and tobacco harm potential for this relatively new safer nicotine product. Tobacco harm reduction is a public health intervention which offers people who use high-risk tobacco products, like cigarettes and some oral tobaccos, the chance to switch to safer nicotine products that pose significantly fewer risks to their health.
Nicotine pouches are thumbnail-sized sachets that are placed under the lip. They are made from vegetable fibres infused with nicotine and a range of flavours. Nicotine pouches are sometimes confused with Swedish Snus, another safer nicotine product that was the subject of a previous GSTHR Briefing Paper. Both products are placed under the lip, but while Swedish snus contains tobacco, nicotine pouches do not contain any raw or processed tobacco leaves.
Credit GSTHR
As a new product category, the body of evidence examining their safety is still growing, but preliminary findings indicate that nicotine pouches offer people who use nicotine a significantly safer alternative to smoking.
Professor Gerry Stimson, Director of K•A•C and Emeritus Professor at Imperial College London, said: “This Briefing Paper aims to increase knowledge about, and awareness of, the tobacco harm reduction potential of nicotine pouches. Good quality information about the full range of different safer nicotine products is essential for consumers, policymakers and regulators.
“Nicotine pouches could make a significant contribution to tobacco harm reduction. This is particularly the case for the more than 300 million people worldwide who use smokeless tobacco products, most of whom live in low- and middle-income countries where health systems are less well-resourced to diagnose and treat non-communicable diseases. High risk oral tobacco products such as betel quid, paan or gutkha contain relatively high levels of carcinogenic and toxic compounds and increase the risk of oral, oesophageal, and pancreatic cancers. In contrast, nicotine pouches have been found to have a similar risk profile to nicotine replacement therapy.
The relative risk hierarchy of the 15 categories of nicotine products. Adapted from Murkett et al by GSTHR with permission
“Nicotine pouches may not yet be as widely used as nicotine vapes, but the global market for these products is already worth 1.5bn USD. This provides good evidence that tobacco users find these products acceptable and will switch to them. In comparison to some other safer nicotine product categories, nicotine pouches are low cost and have minimal start-up and on-costs for consumers, meaning they offer significant hope to many low- and middle-income countries where high-risk oral tobacco use is prevalent.”
ENDS
Contact: For further information, please contact either Oliver Porritt at [email protected] or on +44 79 30 27 99 16 or Ruth Goldsmith at [email protected] or on +44 78 01 84 51 92.
About us: Knowledge·Action·Change (K·A·C) promotes harm reduction as a key public health strategy grounded in human rights. The team has over forty years of experience of harm reduction work in drug use, HIV, smoking, sexual health, and prisons. K·A·C runs the Global State of Tobacco Harm Reduction (GSTHR) which maps the development of tobacco harm reduction and the use, availability and regulatory responses to safer nicotine products, as well as smoking prevalence and related mortality, in over 200 countries and regions around the world. For all publications and live data, visit https://gsthr.org
Our funding: The GSTHR project is produced with the help of a grant from the Foundation for a Smoke-Free World, a US non profit 501(c)(3), independent global organization. The project and its outputs are, under the terms of the grant agreement, editorially independent of the Foundation.
