Residents Want Cannabis Legalized Across Several States

Residents in several states support cannabis legalization, per a new poll.

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Cannabis Council, a special interest group working to end the federal government’s prohibition on cannabis, released the results of a new poll that shows a supermajority of residents in states likes Arizona, Utah, and West Virginia want an end to federal cannabis prohibition during this congressional session.

“We’ve reached an apex in our fight to end federal cannabis prohibition, and it’s clear from these overwhelming figures that Americans in Arizona, Utah and West Virginia support legal cannabis and want their federal and state representatives to do the same,” said Steven Hawkins, the interim president, CEO, and founding member of the council.

“In anticipation of the bill from Senators Booker, Wyden and Schumer, and with the bipartisan vote in favor of legalization in the House last Congress, we are at a critical juncture in our country’s complex journey with cannabis,” Hawkins said.

“We urge government representatives on both sides of the aisle to consider this bipartisan public demand and vote favorably on federal cannabis reform.”

Here are the following results, via the press release sent to Vaping Post:


  • 72% of registered Arizona voters support federal cannabis legalization generally
  • 74% support Senators Sinema and Kelly voting to legalize cannabis federally this year
  • 79% support the US Congress legalizing cannabis this year in light of foreign nations already doing so
  • 64% support expungement of non-violent crimes
  • 86% support allowing medical cannabis to be prescribed in VA facilities


  • 66% of registered Utah voters support federal cannabis legalization generally
  • 69% support Senators Lee and Romney voting to legalize cannabis federally this year
  • 69% support the US Congress legalizing cannabis this year in light of foreign nations already doing so
  • 55% support expungement of non-violent crimes
  • 86% support allowing medical cannabis to be prescribed in VA facilities

West Virginia

  • 70% of registered West Virginia voters support federal cannabis legalization generally
  • 77% support Senators Manchin and Capito voting to legalize cannabis this year
  • 77% support the US Congress legalizing cannabis this year in light of foreign nations already doing so
  • 44% support expungement of non-violent crimes
  • 89% support allowing medical cannabis to be prescribed in VA facilities

Source link

State High Court Overturns Marijuana Legalization Bill In Mississippi

The Mississippi Supreme Court voided a voter-ratified medical cannabis measure.

JACKSON — Earlier this month, the state Mississippi Supreme Court on Friday struck down a medical marijuana legalization initiative that voters had overwhelmingly approved last November, which is shattering a potential market worth more than $250 million.

This is unfortunate because the court order voided a citizen-backed vote that passed the entire state’s electorate by a nearly 3 to 1 margin in favor of the reform measures.

“The Mississippi Supreme Court just overturned the will of the people of Mississippi,” said Ken Newburger, the executive director for the Mississippi Medical Marijuana Association, in a statement to trade publication to

Newburger said: “The court ignored existing case law and prior decisions. Their reasoning ignores the intent of the constitution and takes away people’s constitutional right.”

“It’s a sad day for Mississippi when the Supreme Court communicates to a vast majority of the voters that their vote doesn’t matter.”

This is also the second time in less than a month that a supreme court from a Deep South state ruled against constitutional marijuana legalization measures.

The other case involved the high court in Florida rejecting an adult-use measure to legalize pot for the 2022 general election ballot.

Elsewhere in the United States, other state courts take on the claim that marijuana legalization efforts shouldn’t be decided by voters.

This also includes politicized justices that ruled against a similar measure with the South Dakota high court.

Matthew Schweich, the deputy director of the Marijuana Policy Project, also called the high court’s decision a “deeply flawed ruling” that marks a “cruel and tragic day for sick and suffering people in Mississippi.”

“The legislature must take action to fix the ballot initiative requirements and honor the will of their constituents by enacting Amendment 65 into law through the legislative process,” Schweich wrote in a press statement to the publication

Florida Supreme Court Kills 2022 Marijuana Legalization Initiative

Source link

World Vape Day: Part 2

Live progamming from the World Vapers’ Alliance (WVA) has drawn to a close.

It’s been great to hear from so many passionate speakers from across the globe, all united by a passion for vaping.

Be sure to pick up issue 34 of Vapouround Magazine for full event coverage.

Here are our highlights from the last two talks.

Why Is It Worth Going the Extra Mile for Vaping?

Twitter users will be familiar with these panellists.

It’s fair to say that they all go the extra mile in speaking out for vaping online, often coming up against sceptics and tobacco control absolutists on Twitter.

It can be gruelling to have to continually defend vaping, but all the panellists remain just as passionate as ever.

Topics discussed across the hour included the World Health Organization (WHO), The EU Commission SHEER report on e-cigarettes and, of course, flavour bans.

Yael Ossowski, Deputy Director, Consumer Choice Center

Yael spoke passionately about the role of vaping as a market-led disruptor of combustible tobacco.

He is concerned by the lack of nuance in the WHO’s approach to regulating e-cigarettes as tobacco products.

The health regulator also gives financial incentives to member states, which makes it less likely for low and middle-income countries to adopt pro-vaping regulations.

“I would say that their agenda, having been to two of these very dystopian and Orwellian events, has nothing to do with public health and has everything to do with the eradication of private enterprises that are solving many of these problems, whether it be, obesity, whether it be smoking, they are doing a better than international health bureaucrats.”

Michelle Minton, Senior fellow, Competitive Enterprise Institute

US-based Michelle is ‘pretty pessimistic’ about the prospects for vape regulation under President Biden.

She believes that he doesn’t understand the category and his ‘old school drug warrior’ Vice President Kamala Harris is unlikely to push for a repeal of the current restrictions.

Michelle noted that youth vaping has declined over the past year, likely due to less social interaction among teens and an easing of the media panic and scaremongering that makes young people inclined to rebel.

“Unless there’s another fake EVALI outbreak kind of thing where e-cigarettes are getting blamed for something they didn’t do, I think we may see a little with the Biden administration focusing on other things and the news cycle focusing on, you know, the facts.”

Prof. Bernd Mayer, Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Graz, Austria

It was upsetting to hear how challenging it can be to work in public health and be pro-vaping.

Prof. Mayer assumed tobacco control would be all for a tobacco industry disruptor that benefits public health. However, that has not been his experience.

“[If I work in tobacco control and] I’m against smoking, I must be very happy that there’s a product, [where people] can still consume nicotine but you don’t [need to] smoke anymore, but instead of getting enthusiastic comments I get hostile replies, I was insulted by people.”

Christopher Snowdon, Head of Lifestyle Economics, Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA)

Chris never misses the chance to speak out against ‘nanny state’ politics, so the WHO and European Commission are right in his wheelhouse.

Like the rest of the panellists, he is concerned that regulations are getting more restrictive year on year. However, he has faith in the power of speaking to politicians and MEPs.

“I smoked for decades and then I gave up without even wanting to give up.

“There are literally millions of these stories, and politicians respond because politicians don’t [tend to have an] ideological view of this issue.

“They assume that public health policy is going to be pro-health and anti-smoking policy is going to be anti-smoking, and maybe they don’t understand a lot of the unintended consequences of clamping down on vaping.”

GrimmGreen, Consumer THR Advocate, Profesional Tobacco Control Critic

Vape advocate and YouTuber Nick shares Michelle’s concerns about vaping regulations in the months and years ahead.

However, he also believes that some flavoured products will make it through the FDA’s PMTA process.

“There are 6 million-plus PMTA applications going through the process right now. I think it’s inevitable that the FDA is going to have to approve a lot of vapour products, and I think that some of the vapour products that they approve are going to be flavoured vapour products, I don’t think that the FDA is going to get out of this without approving flavoured vaping products in the future.”

The Great Alexandro “Hazard” Lucian Show

Our final panel was chaired by Brazilian vape influencer Alexandro Lucian.

Joining Alexandro were tobacco control experts Michael Landl of the WVA, former Action on Smoking and Heath (ASH) chair, Clive Bates and Ethan Nadelmann, Founder and former Executive Director  (2000-17) of the Drug Policy Alliance.

The panellists are in no doubt that we are in the midst of a new drug war with the goal of eliminating nicotine.

Alexandro spoke about the massive influence of Bloomberg Philanthropies on the vaping narrative in his native Brazil.

Anti-vape campaign groups have used creative messaging to conflate vaping with smoking, never actually acknowledging the differences.

Ethan is disappointed in some of his former allies who supported cannabis legalisation but are now going after nicotine and tobacco products.

“I’m very upset that some of this effort in the US to demonise the vape products and to criminalise them is happening from the left liberal side of the political spectrum.

“People, politicians, elected officials who were my allies when it came to legalising marijuana, who are my allies for legalising needle exchange programmes and dealing with overdose fatalities, in for ending mass incarceration in America. [They’ve been] caught up in this hysteria.”

Source link

World Vape Day 2021 – Part one of the WVA’s international virtual event

People from across the globe have come together today to celebrate World Vape Day 2021.

The World Vapers’ Alliance brought some of the industry’s biggest names together to highlight the power for good that vaping has become and we are delighted to be a media partner for this event.

Millions of smokers have already made the switch to the reduced risk alternative and the event calls on businesses, advocates and consumers to #GotheExtraMile, promote vaping and help current smokers end their addiction.

Vape Trick Show

Kicking the festivities off with talented vape tricksters from around the globe, World Vape Day showcased the creativity and dedication behind the industry.

We saw some of the biggest and well-known personalities, showing off how, behind all the politics and harm reduction, vaping can also be turned into an art form.

Opening Remarks

In his opening remarks, World Vapers’ Alliance (WVA) director Michael Landl recounted his own experience with vaping, highlighting how making the switch was one of the best decisions he ever made.

He said:

“I thought I would be a lifelong smoker until I visited a vape shop in Vienna.

“Within one week I was a non-smoker…it was a miracle.

“And from that moment onwards I became a vaper and wanted to do everything I could to promote it to others.”

Michael Landl, WVA

Landl explained that he was working in the German Parliament when he realised regulations were being made by people who didn’t understand the benefits of the reduced risk alternative.

After deciding to quit his job, he joined the World Vapers’ Alliance and dedicated his life to helping other smokers take back control of their health and move away from the deadly habit.

He also discussed proposed flavour bans in the EU, saying they could have “very bad and unintended consequences” and that they could be hugely detrimental to public health.

Landl said when banning flavours the demand does not go away, stressing that regulations should be built on evidence, as policymakers risk forcing consumers to the black market by stripping away access to their cessation aids.

Advocacy groups the world over are constantly standing against poor policy and Landl called on consumers to join the fight.

He said:

“We have held many campaigns and see that we can make a difference…although it’s very hard work.

“But it is clear that the more of us there are and the louder we speak…the harder it is for politicians to ignore the voices of vapers.”

Michael Landl, WVA

Time for Optimism, How Vaping is Changing the World

The vaping community is truly international and people from a diverse range of backgrounds and cultures recognise the efficacy of e-cigarettes in helping save lives.

In this segment, community manager for the WVA Liza Katsiashvili spoke to several leaders of WVA partner organisations about about the state of harm reduction in their countries and their vaping success stories.

Kurt Yeo from Vaping Saved My Life, said his organisation continues to oppose proposed unfounded regulatory changes in South Africa.

He said:

“There are plans that would take away the rights of vapers and we have to raise our voices to oppose this.

“We are not anti-regulation, we welcome them… as long as they are backed by robust science and evidence

“However, we have not seen that this has been part of the current process.”

Kurt Yeo, Vaping Saved My Life

Maria Papaioannoy of Rights4Vapers explained that policies in Canada are almost constantly shifting, saying that laws surrounding the reduced risk product are all ‘vape and mirrors.’

She stressed that Canada’s current landscape is ‘heartbreaking’ and policymakers are not properly educated on the public health benefits.

Maria said:

“There are so many different regulations in Canada, that everytime you wake up there is something to contend with.

“We have shifted from policymakers embracing vaping as a means of improving health, to one of moral panic.

“There is now this fear that vaping is worse than smoking and that it is going to kill everyone.

Maria Papaioannoy, Rights4Vapers Canada

She said that advocacy groups in Canada are being ‘systematically excluded’ from the harm reduction conversation, pointing out that politicians need to acknowledge the science and listen to experts if we are to overcome the smoking epidemic.

Cristiana Batista of APORVAP (Associação Portuguesa de Vaporizadores) explained how damaging Portugal’s high taxation can be for the country’s smokers.

He said:

“When it comes to high taxes, people will go to the black market…so this is our main focus.

“We need to reduce the excessive rates of taxation in Portugal and this has been the biggest battle that we have to win.”

Cristiana Batista, APORVAP

He capped off by explaining he will not stop campaigning for vaping and will continue to stand against bad policy and people who don’t understand the benefits.

Danny Wang of Vape Taiwan also joined the livestream, saying that it’s vital for vapers to stand up for their rights and support the industry if we want to protect public health.

The science and real-world examples have shown that stringent and unsubstantiated regulations can force consumers to buy their vape products from illicit sellers.

He said:

“As more and more people support the idea of tobacco harm reduction, the government will have to consider this issue very carefully so as not to upset a large section of the population.”

Danny Wang, Vape Taiwan

Liza also spoke with Joseph Magero (Campaign for a Safe Alternative, Africa), Francisco Ordonez (Asovape Colombia), Ignacio Leiva Benitez (Asovape Chile) and Jeff Zamora (Asovape Costa Rica).

For a look at part two of the World Vape Day events, including talks with Clive Bates, GrimmGreen and the WVA’s very own Michael Landl, see our next blog.

Source link

Philippines Pushing For Strong E-Cigarette Regulations

MANILA — The House of Representatives for the Republic of the Philippines is prepared to move forward with a proposed landmark bill that would regulate the sale and manufacture of electronic cigarettes and heated tobacco products to curb cigarette smoking.

154 co-authors in the 300-man chamber for the House would develop the Vaporized Nicotine Product bill that seeks to establish a clear and effective regulatory framework to monitor product manufacturing standards and prevent sales to minors.

According to the English-speaking Manila Standard, the legislation regulates these products further to avoid “unintended or potential adverse consequences on the use of these products.”

“Although the country is already experiencing a proliferation of sale and use of HTPs and vaping products among Filipino consumers, we do not have a clear and effective law and regulation, including product standards that should govern these products,” said Rep. Sharon Garin, representing Quezon City, is the principal sponsor for the legislation before the House. “Thus, through the passage of this bill, we fill this gap on regulation.”

Garbin argued that more than 75 other countries worldwide had passed laws regulating the sale of e-cigarettes and vaping products. This metric also includes the United States, London, New Zealand, Australia (more aggressively), Canada, and others.

The number of countries that revoked the ban of e-cigarettes also went down in 2020, with Garbin citing that Norway is the latest country to reverse its policy from a ban.

“The governments of Canada and New Zealand have now also recognized the potential benefit smokers can gain when switching to vaping,” Garbin said.

“Their decision to adopt such policies is anchored on decades of research on the subject of nicotine, e-cigarettes, tobacco and harm reduction.”

The Standard also said that the bill was “extensively discussed and debated by experts, scientists, and other stakeholders during the joint hearings conducted by the House Committees on Trade and Industry and on Health.”

Source link

WHO Reaffirms Its Stance Against Vaping Ahead of World No Tobacco Day

Contradicting all the scientific research indicating the benefits obtained by switching from smoking to vaping, the WHO keeps using World No Tobacco Day to push its anti-vaping agenda. In total contrast with other health entities such as Public Health England (PHE), in 2020 the WHO inaccurately claimed that ENDS and smokeless alternatives do not help smokers quit smoking; are more harmful than combustible tobacco; and that nicotine is equivalent to heroin in terms of addictiveness.

A year later, in a press release titled “Quit tobacco to be a winner,” the WHO is at it once again. It insists that the tobacco industry has “promoted e-cigarettes as cessation aids under the guises of contributing to global tobacco control.” Insisting on referring to the vaping industry as the tobacco industry, the WHO added that it employed “strategic marketing tactics to hook children on this same portfolio of products, making them available in over 15,000 attractive flavors.”

“We must be guided by science and evidence, not the marketing campaigns of the tobacco industry—the same industry that has engaged in decades of lies and deceit to sell products that have killed hundreds of millions of people,” said WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. “E-cigarettes generate toxic chemicals, which have been linked to harmful health effects such as cardiovascular disease and lung disorders.”

WHO claims that evidence on e-cigs as cessation aids was “inconclusive”

The agency went to on to claim that the scientific evidence on e-cigarettes as cessation aids was “inconclusive,” and that “switching from conventional tobacco products to e-cigarettes is not quitting.” Sadly these statements couldn’t be further from the truth as there are countless peer-reviewed studies conducted by independent public health experts which indicate otherwise.

“The WHO has taken this anti-vaping position—repeatedly—in the past and seemingly continues to ignore a burgeoning body of evidence to the contrary. Despite including “harm reduction strategies” in its definition of “tobacco control,” the agency remains steadfast in denying the expert opinions of an expanding number of academics and scientific bodies—like the UK’s Royal College of Physicians and the US National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine—that vaping is much less harmful than smoking,” points out an article on Filter.

Tobacco Harm Reduction Group About “Concerning” WHO Report

Meanwhile, in a recent letter the Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates (CAPHRA), has urged the WHO Executive Board to address concerns over the lack of transparency in a report, regarding the Tenth Meeting of the WHO Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation. The group explained that the report failed to consider all the scientific evidence in favour of tobacco harm reduction strategies, such as the use of electronic cigarettes and heated tobacco products.

“The recommendations in this report may further hinder effective access to lower-risk products as a result of the Study Group’s Report in a region of the world with the most harm from combustible and unsafe oral tobacco use,” said CAPHRA.

The group’s Executive Coordinator Nancy Loucas, said the Study Group Report reviewed nine background papers and two horizon scanning papers, however they did not share the actual papers, or share reference links. Similarly, the Report also stated that their recommendations were assisted by discussions with “invited subject-matter experts”, however once again, the names of these experts were also not made known.

Asia-Pacific Groups Create Petition Urging WHO to End Lies About Vaping

Source link

Kiwis Reminded That More Action is Required on World Vape Day

Tobacco harm reduction advocates are encouraged to send their submissions on New Zealand’s Government Smokefree action plan.

Falling on the 30th of May, just a day before World No Tobacco on May 31st, the AVCA is reminding Kiwi ex-smokers and vaping advocates, that more action is required to achieve the Smokefree Aotearoa goal. More submissions on the Government’s action plan could go a long way in highlighting the importance of including vaping products in the

World Vape Day is a celebration of personal stories of smokers who have found an incredibly effective way out of smoking, thanks to the advent of innovative smoke-free products,” said AVCA co-director Nancy Loucas.

She added that sadly, despite the global success and data available in favour of vaping, the World Health Organisation (WHO) continues to condemn the products. In fact, the WHO is once again using World No Tobacco Day to push its anti-vaping agenda.

In total contrast with other health entities such as Public Health England (PHE), the WHO keeps claiming that ENDS and smokeless alternatives do not help smokers quit smoking; are more harmful than combustible tobacco; and that nicotine is equivalent to heroin in terms of addictiveness.

Study found no teen vaping “epidemic” in New Zealand

Moreover, added Loucas, in New Zealand there is an increasingly negative media narrative about an alleged teen “vaping epidemic.” However, a peer reviewed study found no such thing.

“After examining a survey of over 27,000 secondary school students, University of Auckland researchers last year confirmed there was no youth vaping epidemic in New Zealand. They found that only 0.8% of 14 and 15-year-olds, who had never smoked, were regular vapers. It’s important we stay focused on the evidence, not the emotion,” said Loucas.

Earlier this year, Loucas explained that while it’s clear that vaping has helped many Kiwis quit tobacco, Maori and Pacific people sadly remain decades off becoming smokefree unless significant interventions and actions are taken soon.

NZ should follow the UK’s example

She has emphasized that just like the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) has been an effective catalyst for switching smokers to vaping, educating smokers about the relative benefits of vaping is key. She added that the government’s recent decision to refrain from hiking tobacco tax was a progressive step in the right direction.

“It’s great the Government wasn’t tempted to hike tobacco tax. It’s terribly regressive, hitting the vulnerable the hardest with the high Māori smoking rate budging little. AVCA believes education remains key, as does ensuring vaping is an accessible and appealing alternative.”

New Zealand: Smokefree 2025 Plan Considers Nicotine And Age Restrictions

Source link

North Dakota Vape Shops Disobey Smoke-Free Laws

A study by North Dakota State University finds that vape shops in the state disobey smoke-free laws.

FARGO — Public health researchers at the North Dakota State University found that vape shops in the state overwhelmingly disobey the statewide smoke-free and clean air laws.

Kelly Buettner-Schmidt, a professor of nursing, led a research team that conducted a public policy compliance analysis measuring compliance.

The other researchers include Donald R. Miller, professor of pharmacy practice; Megan Orr, associate professor of statistics; Katelyn Rykal and Missy Berry, NDSU School of Nursing; and Kathleen Swanson, assistant professor of practice NDSU School of Nursing.

The study was published in the May edition of the peer-reviewed journal Public Health Nursing. According to Buettner-Schmidt et al., the study was designed “to determine compliance with North Dakota’s smoke-free law in vape shops and other tobacco specialty shops selling electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) or e-liquids.”

The study was also structured to include 35 vape retailers that sell devices and liquids that contain nicotine and don’t contain nicotine. The study’s results showed that vaping occurred inside five shops, or 14.3 percent of the ones observed. 5.7 percent, or two shops, permitted smoking and aerosols within the required smoke-free areas.

When it came to indoor and outdoor signage requirements, 11.4% of shops complied with indoor signage, and 48.6% complied with outdoor signage requirements, notes NDSU.

“Overall compliance remained low, although much of the noncompliance was related to signage,” notes the study’s official conclusion.

“Classifying ENDS as tobacco products would require tobacco licensure of shops selling ENDS and e-liquids, aiding in identification of the shops for education and enforcement efforts to ensure compliance with the law and to improve public health protection.”

“When viewed overall, compliance remained low,” said Buettner-Schmidt in a press statement released by North Dakota State University’s communications office.

“North Dakota has one of the strongest laws in the United States to protect citizens from secondhand smoke,” she added. “Even though the state’s smoke‐free law has been in effect since 2012, vaping and smoking still occurred in required smoke‐free and vape‐free areas, according to our most recent study.”

US: Two Vape Shop Staff Caught Selling Class A Drugs in Store

Source link

IQOS 3 MRTP Application Moves Forward

PMI product sees movement.

WASHINGTON — The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said that Philip Morris Products S.A.’s modified risk tobacco product (MRTP) application for the latest iteration of the IQOS heat-not-burn system holder and charger. The Center for Tobacco Products at the FDA recently opened up the Federal Register for public comments on the MRTP application.

“PMI is fully committed to a smoke-free future, one where we completely replace cigarettes with scientifically substantiated smoke-free alternatives that are a better choice for adults who would otherwise continue smoking,” said Jacek Olczak, the chief executive officer of Philip Morris International. “Our commitment to a science-based future is unmatched, having invested more than $8 billion since 2008 on smoke-free products.”

Olczak added: “This application underscores PMI’s on-going commitment to make new innovations available to American adult smokers through the FDA process; the confidence we have in our science; and our belief that public scrutiny and open engagement with governments is vital to achieving a smoke-free future.”

PMI and its North American products subsidiary submitted the application with the intention of scoring an MRTP status similar to the one granted to the IQOS 2.4 system on July 7, 2020.

The IQOS 2.4 system is the only electronic nicotine delivery system to be granted marketing authorization as a modified tobacco product with a less harmful characteristic than smoking.

“To authorize MRTP consumer communications, the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products is required by law to conclude that a product is appropriate to promote the public health,” states a press statement from PMI.

IQOS is sold in the United States by PMI, through a special agreement with Altria Group.

The device is popular all over the world, especially with product variations in Japan. Heated tobacco products are also considered less harmful forms of nicotine delivery than traditional cigarettes or other combustible tobacco products.

Source link

Anti Vaping WHO Campaign Says Bin Your Vape!

The anti vaping WHO is at it again and now claim e-cigarettes don’t help smokers quit, and should literally be chucked into the rubbish bin…

Even for this un-elected bunch of shysters the World Health Organization’s latest stop smoking campaign is really scraping the barrel of anti vaping poisonous propaganda.

anti-vaping who quitters are winners

I’ve touched on the WHO’s awfully managed Commit to Quit campaign a few times, but they’ve really upped the stakes as we get closer to the none event that is World No Tobacco Day.

I’ve lost count just how many times myself, fellow vape writers, advocacy groups, UK politicians and the world’s leading medical professionals have taken the WHO to task on its continued anti vaping stance…talk about banging my head on the keyboard…

OK…deep breath because here we go again.

According to the ‘experts‘ [lol] from this lofty ignorant organization, smokers should ignore vaping as a way to quit as it doesn’t work and offers what it considers to be the very best method as:

The campaign aims to empower 100 million tobacco users to make a quit attempt by creating networks of support and increasing access to services proven to help tobacco users quit successfully.

This will be achieved by scaling-up existing services such as brief advice from health professionals and national toll free quit lines, as well as launching innovative services like Florence, WHO’s first digital health worker, and chatbot support programmes on WhatsApp and Viber.

To truly help tobacco users quit, they need to be supported with tried and tested policies and interventions to drive down the demand for tobacco.

In a word…bollox

They forgot to mention how all this leads to filling the coffers of Big Pharma and filling their own bottomless pockets with ‘kick-backs‘ – ooops I mean of course ‘donations‘ – as stop smoking pills are pushed on the unwary…

Ssssh…don’t tell them about the side-effects…suicide and other stuff…

Not only that, the anti vaping WHO and it’s stop smoking campaigns are funded by Johnson and Johnson…yeah the big boys behind the Nicorette range of patches, gums and sprays that science has proven quite simply don’t work.

As I’ve said many times before, it’s funny how those flavours, and of course, nicotine are good, whilst those to do with vaping are bad!

Nothing to see here…no agenda…move along…

Florence stop smoking bot WHO
Florence the stop smoking bot!

Look, we all know that a 20mg pod kit will stop most folk from smoking faster than you can say Florence the digital health worker chat bot…FFS…

Or come to that ringing up a bored Karen on a quit smoking ‘hotline‘ for ‘advice‘ on how to stub out the cancer sticks.

It gets better…or worse for the 11 billion plus smokers out there.

The WHO’s ‘big idea‘ – apart from cartoon characters, Karen’s on the end of a phone and ‘brief‘ meetings with advisors, is to raise tax on lit tobacco and create more smoke free zones…


Seems they’ve missed the number of smokers in say Australia where lit tobacco prices are astronomical, or indeed here in the UK where prices are high yet as I wrote recently, the 18 to 24 year-olds are taking up smoking in worrying numbers.

For a bunch of so called ‘world’s best medical experts‘ they don’t seem to have their collective sticky fingers on the pulse of anything by the look of it.

Though in truth not even the current WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is a medical doctor…makes you wonder how Ted got the job 😉

Anti Vaping WHO – “Switching To E-Cigs Is NOT Quitting”

Yeah, you read that right.

The so called guardians of world health reckon the 95% + safer option of vaping is not quitting smoking…as the headline says WTAF!!??

quit smoking by vaping

Indeed it claims:

The tobacco industry has continuously attempted to subvert these life-saving public health measures.

Over the last decade, the tobacco industry has promoted e-cigarettes as cessation aids under the guises of contributing to global tobacco control.

Meanwhile, they have employed strategic marketing tactics to hook children on this same portfolio of products, making them available in over 15,000 attractive flavours.

The scientific evidence on e-cigarettes as cessation aids is inconclusive and there is a lack of clarity as to whether these products have any role to play in smoking cessation.

Switching from conventional tobacco products to e-cigarettes is not quitting.

Wow there’s more than a hint of conspiracy theory right there lol.

Look, Big Tobacco was late into the whole vaping game and judging from the Big Tobacco vape products I’ve tried they have some serious catching up to do.

Sure some companies have bought out some of the smaller vape companies, and yeah maybe one or two of the most popular pod kits are owned by Big Tobacco.

However as new vapers see what the rest of the real global vape and e-liquid companies have to offer, they soon ditch the ones bought in corner shops and garages, and stay off the stinkies with a so called Big Vape set-up.

Apparently E-cigs Are Toxic!

I said at the start, the WHO is quite literally telling you to chuck your vape gear into the nearest bin.

Checkout its latest tweet and please watch the short video – if you don’t get a tad mad, I’ll be surprised 🙂

Like I’ve said, W T A F !!!

Do read the whole thread – plenty of ex smokers now vapers rip the WHO a new one lol…lovely to see 🙂

Anyway, WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus doubles down on the video and WHO anti vaping message with this BS to boot:

We must be guided by science and evidence, not the marketing campaigns of the tobacco industry – the same industry that has engaged in decades of lies and deceit to sell products that have killed hundreds of millions of people.

E-cigarettes generate toxic chemicals, which have been linked to harmful health effects such as cardiovascular disease & lung disorders.

Listen Ted, the science and evidence is very clear.

Vaping saves lives and 50 million – and rising – ex smokers can testify to that.

Meanwhile there’s over 1.1 billion smokers in the world and both of those numbers come from the WHO.

Just imagine how many smokers lives could be saved if the so called World Health Organization embraced vaping as a harm reduction tool and healthier option.

Remember, it’s not the nicotine that kills – its the burning tar and all the other carcinogenic shite in lit tobacco.

Any of you remember this very simple yet highly effective and quite shocking experiment conducted by Public Health England?

Shocking Public Health England Video PROVES Vaping Is Less Harmful Than Smoking

anti vaping who

It shows e-cigarette vapour compared to lit tobacco smoke….now imagine that cotton wool was your lungs…makes you think huh?

The message is as crystal clear as most vaper’s lungs….so why does the WHO steadfastly ignore the real facts?

Please pop your answers to that simple enough question in the comments below as to WHY the WHO is so anti vaping 😉

World Health Organization..?

More and more the World HARM Organization…

Source link